Source: NOAA/ESRL |
That large-scale pattern remains in force today, leading to well above average temperatures in the Arctic, where sea-ice coverage is at a record low and above average temperatures across much of North America. In contrast, ,below average temperatures exist across much of Eurasia, especially Siberia.
Source: ClimateReanalyzer.org |
This weekend, I watched some of the World Cup skiing races from Levi, Finland and it was like viewing another planet as it sure looked like winter there, whereas here in Utah I threw on shorts and a t-shirt to mountain bike.
In fact, the past month (13 October - 13 November) rates as the 2nd warmest on record at the Salt Lake City International Airport, with an average temperature of 55.6ºF. Just 0.1ºF ahead of it is the comparable period from 1927.
Source: NOAA Regional Climate Centers |
However, dramatic and abrupt change is coming. The GFS 500-mb and 6-h accumulated precipitation forecast below shows a deep upper-level trough centered over Utah at 1800 UTC (1100 MST) Thursday. WHOOPIE!!!
The transition from Tuesday through Thursday is going to be enormous. The GFS calls for a 35ºF temperature swing at 11,000 feet.
Basically, we are looking at a transition from temperatures that may reach 70ºF at the airport tomorrow (Tuesday) to snow on the valley floor possibly as early as Wednesday night and Thursday.
There is a great deal of spread amongst the models in terms of the how everything will go down Wednesday and Thursday. The 0600 UTC GFS favors an amplified trough, which leads to a later frontal passage and later precipitation, as well as a longer period of precipitation following frontal passage. In contrast, the 0000 UTC ECMWF and 1200 UTC NAM (which just came in) favor a weaker trough, which leads to an earlier frontal passage on Wednesday and precipitation moving in as early as late Wednesday afternoon or Wednesday evening.
In either event, Thursday is going to bring a shock to the system. Given the spread in forecasts, it's too soon to discuss with any confidence the details of how this storm will evolve, but prudence dictates that you take care of your car and commute winterization needs by Wednesday afternoon.
Should you get the skis waxed? Well, I still see a wide range of outcomes given the diversity of model forecasts in the various ensembles, with perhaps a storm total of 6 inches being on the low end of possibilities and something like 30" at the high end if everything were to come together wonderfully.
Below are our downscaled snow estimates from the North American Ensemble Forecast System and these show the mean of all ensemble members being around 18" for upper Little Cottonwood with about a 90% chance of 6 inches or more, 70% chance of 12 inches or more, and 20% chance of 24 inches or more.
We've made some changes to this algorithm over the summer and it's not as "jacked up" as it has been in the past. My take, however, is that if one were to add the European ensemble to the mix, these numbers would shift downward a bit. Keep expectations low and hope for the bigger solutions to verify.
I love being on a peak when the front comes in and the temp drops. If you had to ballpark the best time (maybe a 4-6 hour range) for me to make that happen, what would you suggest?
ReplyDeleteBecause of the spread in model forecasts, I can't provide a confident answer. The 12Z NAM brings in the shift to NW flow at about 11 am Wed. The 6Z GFS doesn't do it until something like midnight to 6 am Thursday. Also, there's no guarantee this will be a well defined frontal boundary. Best to check forecasts tomorrow afternoon and see if solutions have converged.
DeleteApparently, the all time high for KSLC in November is only 75 degrees (which has been hit several times). Looks to me like there is actually a slight chance to break that tomorrow if we really mix out in the southerly flow (I am seeing 6 or 7 C at 700mb in the models).
ReplyDeleteHow would you explain the relationship between climate change and the weather pattern lock-in which has been causing above average temperatures in the Arctic & North America and below average ones in Eurasia? Easy to understand why increased greenhouse gases in the atmosphere would cause global warming, and why global warming would result in increased instances of extreme weather, but not the lock-in of weather patterns. Thanks, Kurt
ReplyDeleteThis is a very good question, but one for which there isn't a clear answer (yet). Perhaps this will be the subject of a future post, although I need some time to dig into it as it isn't my area.
DeleteJim