Tuesday, December 15, 2015

Storm Perspectives

It's been quite a while since we had a storm like this, especially on the valleys and benches.  It's great to have winter as it should be.  A few thoughts on the event this morning.

How good were the forecasts?

Snow forecasting in northern Utah is all about synoptic possibilities and mesoscale uncertainties.  The former means that we can often anticipate when the large-scale ingredients for a significant storm are present, but the latter implies that the devil is in the detail and specific forecasts of the timing, intensity, and spatial distribution of the snowfall is exceedingly difficult.

For the present storm, we had strong agreement amongst the models and ensemble modeling systems that a significant storm would hit the state.  The NWS issued watches and warnings in a timely manner with good lead time.  The forecasts did not capture, however, some aspects of the snowfall timing, intensity, and distribution, most notably in some bench areas where the snow came harder and faster yesterday than anticipated, resulting in greater accumulations than forecast.  In addition, their briefing on Sunday afternoon suggested that the Salt Lake Valley may see less of an impact for the Monday morning commute (emphasis on may), although my small sample of Sunday evening news broadcasts didn't seem to give much of a hint of this.


Forecast updates yesterday afternoon for last night also appear to have overdone the overnight accumulations, at least in the Salt Lake Valley.  Nevertheless, given the limitations of the science today, by and large the forecasts were generally good for this event.

Failure to prepare is preparing to fail

Yesterday morning's rush hour was a mess.  The first major storm of the year is always bad, but really this was the first major storm in two years, and it showed.  A few thoughts come to mind.  First, it appears we've forgotten what snow looks like.  Yes, that white stuff on the road really is snow and it does pay to slow down when driving on it.  Second, the bald tires we've been putting off replacing now for two years really don't work in the snow.  Finally, when our tires slip, it can be satisfying to push the accelerator all the way to the floor, but that really doesn't do any good.  Of course, these statements don't apply to any of us as I'm sure all readers of this blog were well prepared :-).

What surprised me most about this event was how unprepared the U and many school districts appeared to be.  Given the forecasts, I didn't expect that.  The contrast in the information feed from yesterday morning to this morning is quite large and suggests that everyone was at best out of practice and at worst simply did not take the forecasts seriously.  Yesterday I received no notices from the U during the morning rush hour and when I finally did get one, it came via a forwarded e-mail from our administrative assistant because the system was apparently overloaded.  Today, I've already received a notice concerning campus status.  Much better.  Ditto for West High where my children attend.  No info until late yesterday morning, but notices are flying in via text and voice mail today.

I do feel for those who have to provide these notices and make closure decisions.  Forecast reliability for these events isn't as high as we would like, and there are a significant number of false alarms for major snow events.  On the other hand, yesterday seemed like a case of being unprepared.  Hopefully we've gotten that out of our systems and we're ready to go for the rest of winter.

Stuff I don't understand

The enhancement of precipitation on the eastern benches of the Skull, Tooele, and Salt Lake Valleys (as well as the Bountiful Bench) was most impressive and produced precipitation rates (snowfall and water equivalent) that were much higher than observed in the higher mountains.  Although I have hypotheses for why this happens, I don't really understand why.  Further confusion is added by the overnight transition to higher precipitation rates at Alta-Collins, which (fortunately) yielded another 14 inches of snow and .45" of water after 6 PM.



We don't understand these variations in orographic enhancement and we certainly can't forecast them.  Some of you people out there who are smarter than me should help us figure this out.

5 comments:

  1. I, too don't envy those who have to make closure decisions, especially considering the fact that administrators get awful complaints from parents no matter what decision they make. Yesterday it seemed that more late starts should have been called, as some buses struggled to get around. Today my kids are enjoying a lazy morning with a two hour delay, and I drove to work on almost clear roads. I do prefer decisions to be made erring on the side of safety, so no complaints here.

    Perhaps I remember incorrectly (I've been a Utahn for seven years), but in Colorado on the Front Range, it seemed like storms were easier to predict and prepare for. Not that forecasts were always right, but if there was snow in the 1-2 day forecast, we'd generally have snow.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is only an anecdotal perspective, but winter storms in the Boulder/ Denver area are probably a bit more predictable than those in Utah, but not necessarily those in the Colorado Rockies, which are about as hard to forecast as the storms here.

      Delete
  2. Hi Jim, a few posts back I asked if you know of an ECMWF of better resolution than from their site. I found this link from Canada that has some much easier to decipher products (for me anyway).. There is a meteogram for SLC, and some better panel graphics/animations. You may have found this already, but for other snow hoppers, it's below:

    http://meteocentre.com/models/models.php?lang=en&map=na&run=00&mod=ecmwf&mode=latest&yyyy=latest&mm=latest&dd=latest

    So the snow god that brought this storm was KuraOkami no kami (Shinto). Sometimes the old gods are all you can turn to.. :) Khione, Kun Aymara and Oreithyia all failed to deliver, though perhaps the sacrafices were off.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The snowfall patterns in this storm were very sensitive to the lower-lying portions of terrain features, with significant lift beginning well upwind. I think it was a combination of a relatively strong low level pressure gradient, weak cross-barrier flow near 700 mb (as was mentioned before), plus fairly efficient microphysics which allowed much of the snow to complete its growth cycle and precipitate upwind of the barriers.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Same thing happened here in Bozeman with this storm, Jim. Bozeman had between 7-10" which was about what Bridger Bowl and Big Sky. Just to the West in the Tobacco Root Mountains they picked up around 35". Very interesting lack of orographics going on

    ReplyDelete