Friday, October 30, 2020

Stand Up for Dr. Angela Dunn

State epidemiologist Dr. Angela Dunn lives a few blocks from us.  Earlier this week, her address was released on social media and groups gathered at her house yesterday in protest.  This is a diabolical act of harassment and intimidation that cannot stand.  Picketing of this type at someone's residence is also likely illegal.  I am not sure what codes apply within the Salt Lake City limits, but Salt Lake County has an entire section of code dedicated to this issue and classifies it as a Class B misdemeanor.  

Dr. Dunn is not an elected official.  She is a civil servant who has had to do a very difficult job.  In the tweet below, her neighbor, Mark Cronin, shares views that are similar to mine.  


Although not at the same level or scale, I have some experience with intimidation tactics, including state legislators threatening to pull the funding of my climate collaborators and an individual who aggressively shouted at me after testimony for a state legislature committee.  I no longer remember the details of that encounter, but I recall that I was concerned the individual was going to become violent and defused the situation by slowly moving closer to a nearby police officer.  Such experiences were the exception and not the rule, but they were difficult nonetheless.

However, nobody every showed up at my house to picket me and my family.

Where are we as a nation when epidemiologists like Dr. Dunn and Dr. Anthony Fauci need bodyguards and police for protection?  Where will be be in a few more weeks as hospitalizations and deaths mount due to the spread of coronavirus in Utah and many other states?  We need them more than ever and we must stand up for their right to do their jobs without harassment or intimidation.  

This does not mean that people cannot question or protest, but they need to use appropriate methods for doing so.  With rights come responsibilities.    

3 comments:

  1. Excellent post. When state and federal leadership routinely downplay the role of science, despite requiring science to save us, many people view it as the enemy. That puts innocent scientists in the cross-fire. Vote, vote, vote...

    ReplyDelete
  2. Really sad commentary on where we are at as a nation.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I am a little late in reading this, but have a few thoughts. First, I completely agree that with rights come responsibilities. I completely support our constitutional freedoms, but people need to realize that freedom doesn’t simply entail unrestrained expression of whatever they feel like, or mis-treatment of others, or else free speech will sadly be lost at some point.
    Secondly, it is often easy to frame an issue as “science vs...”, such as science vs. faith or science vs. politics etc. I think in reality, those of us working in a “scientific” field are prone to the same biases and weaknesses as anyone else, and these can influence our interpretation of things much more than we ourselves are aware of. Obviously science and the scientific method are of great value, although the history of science shows that scientists themselves are often way too confident in their interpretations. From my observations, the COVID situation is an example of how political influences on all sides of the spectrum can affect anyone’s interpretation, even for an issue that has a strong scientific component to it. Science is critically important, but we as scientists need to be aware of our own biases and limitations. Sorry this is long but I hope it makes some sense.

    ReplyDelete