Monday, August 17, 2020

Scorching Heat in Death Valley

 Yesterday's maximum temperature at Furnace Creek in Death Valley reached 130˚F.  


Source: Richard Brian/Las Vegas Review-Journal/AP

It appears that this is the third highest temperature ever recorded on the face of the Earth, behind the 134˚F recorded in Death Valley on July 10, 1913 and 131˚F in Kebili, Tunisa on July 7, 1931.  Both of those early 20th century temperatures have, however, been called into question by weather historian Christopher Burt (see this Capital Weather Gang article).   

Let's have some fun and compare the 134˚F day in Death Valley to yesterday's 130˚F.  We can do this using the 20th century reanalysis, which has created global atmospheric analyses from 1835 to 2015.  The 20th century reanalysis is a product of mathematical and statistical wizardry in which surface observations, which are essentially the only observations available in the 1800s and early 1900s, are used to create an analysis.  

Below I plot the 500-mb analysis for 0000 UTC July 11, 1913, which corresponds to 5 PM on the afternoon of Death Valley's 134˚F day.  Death Valley was beneath a west-to-east oriented upper-level ridge, which meteorologists refer to as zonally elongated.  500-mb heights over Death Valley were a bit higher than 5940 meters.  

The 850-mb (about 5,000 feet above sea level) temperature analysis (in degrees Kelvin, subtract 273 for Celsius) shows temperatures near Death Valley of about 306K, or 33˚C (sorry for K, but it's what the 20th century reanalysis site provides).  Assuming constant density to the elevation of Furnace Creek yields a temperature of about 48.5˚C (119.3˚F).  A quick note that there are good reasons why the maximum surface air temperature might exceed this constant-density temperature estimate in Death Valley (and indeed, in Salt Lake City, the maximum surface air temperature in summer is often 3˚C/5˚F higher than such an estimate).  Thus, is is provided for comparison rather than absolute purposes.  

Yesterday, when Death Valley hit 130˚F, the ridge orientation was somewhat different.  It was centered over Utah and elongated from south to north, or what meteorologists call meridonally elongated.  500-mb heights over Death Valley were above 5970 meters, so a bit higher than on the 134˚F day.  

850-mb temperatures were around 35˚C, also higher than on the 134˚F day.  Assuming constant density, that would yield a temperature at the elevation of Furnace Creek of about 50.5˚C (123˚F).  

There is enough uncertainty in the 20th century reanalysis that we probably can't conclude with absolute certainty that the large-scale airmass yesterday was warmer than on the 134˚F day.  The 20th century reanalysis is also lower resolution than the analysis presented above for yesterday, and this affects the numbers used for comparison.  With more sleuthing and statistical analysis of the uncertainty in the 20th century reanalysis, one can probably estimate the likelihood of the airmass yesterday being warmer than that on the 134˚F day.  I suspect such an estimate would indicate that it is more likely than not that the airmass resident over Furnace Creek yesterday was warmer than that on the 134˚F day.

Maximum surface temperature is dependent, however, on other factors, including the land-surface conditions, cloud cover, etc.  I lack the time to dig into this, but suspect the team that investigates the veracity of the 130˚F measurement will be considering these factors and it is something that Christopher Burt discusses in his analysis of the 134˚F day.

That team will also investigate potential instrumentation biases, which hopefully we will hear about soon concerning yesterday's maximum.  

In any event, yesterday does appear to have been an exceptionally hot day in Death Valley, amongst the hottest weather conditions ever measured on the face of the Earth.  Sadly, we will probably yesterday's maximum eclipsed in the coming decades as global warming continues. 

6 comments:

  1. Nice write up on the Death Valley temps. I am in Liberty and a weather nut. I noticed in the past 2 days there has been much less difference in temps from Ogden Valley compared to the Wasatch Front. Today at 3 pm it was 98 in Eden and 99 at the Ogden airport. I do not remember a time in the summer when the upper valley has been this warm compared to the lower valley. Is their a reason for this?
    thanks, cowpie

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't have a good answer for your question. I don't watch these stations enough to know their typical behavior. If the winds are light, temperature sensors that are not mechanically aspirated sometimes get a bit warmer than the ambient air temperature. This is one possibility. Others could include differences in nearby irrigation, etc. These are just educated guesses.

      Jim

      Delete
  2. Very interesting. Please explain how you estimate surface temperature from 850-mb temperature.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This assumes that the atmosphere is "well mixed", meaning it has a constant density, from 850 mb to the surface. Under such conditions, the temperature increases 1˚C every 100 meters of elevation decrease (or alternatively, decreases every 1˚C every 100 meters of elevation increase).

      This is a good assumption in the lower atmosphere during summer, except very near the surface (within about 100 meters). Near the surface, the temperature changes even more rapidly with elevation and thus the maximum temperature can be even higher than estimated with this technique.

      Jim

      Delete
    2. Wouldn't 700 mb be a better level to use, given that the 850 mb level is either below or very close to the land surface in a lot of the west?

      Delete
    3. For some areas of the west, yes, but I figure for Death Valley, 850 is better.

      On the other hand, the mixed-layer is so deep right now that it probably doesn't matter.

      Jim

      Delete