About Yesterday's Snow Bomb

Impressive snow totals and snowfall rates occurred yesterday in Little Cottonwood Canyon.  The big winner was Alta.  As readers of this blog are well aware, the Alta Ski Patrol maintains a great snow-study plot in the upper elevations of Collins Gulch.  The hourly measurements from this site are a treasure trove to meteorologists like me who are starved for observations from higher-altitude locations.  The "snow interval" data below is collected by an ultrasonic snow-depth sensor that is mounted on a pole above a white snowboard that is wiped every 12-hours.  It recorded 20" of snow over and 11 hour period prior to being wiped just after 1600 MST.  

Really, the 20" mark was attained in only 9 hours, from 0400 to 1300 MST, yielding a mean snowfall rate of more than 2 inches and hour for that period, with a peak snowfall rate of 5 inches from 0600 to 0700 MST.  Due to roundoff of the measurement, there is a little uncertainty in that estimate, but it's safe to say it was snowing very hard at that time.  A bit more snow fell 1300 MST, but its rate of accumulation was roughly balanced by new-snow settlement, so the final tally remained 20 inches.  

Observations from Mt. Baldy show that the first 6 inches fell as the flow switched from WSW to WNW and the temperature dropped about 4F from 0400 to 0600 MST.  That indicates a frontal passage, but even during this period, there wasn't a strongly organized frontal band, although there were scattered showers and clear evidence of orographic modulation of the precipitation, meaning related to flow interaction with the topography.  Radar imagery at 0425 MST (1125 UTC) when snow was picking up at Alta showed strong modulation of radar echoes by the Oquirrhs and the Wasatch with echoes strongest over and/or windward of those features and strong precipitation shadowing in their lees, including over the western Salt Lake Valley.  So, this was very much an orographic storm right from the beginning. 

During the period of heaviest snowfall from 0600 to 0700 MST, the flow on Mt. Baldy was WNW and radar coverage became more extensive.  Still, echoes were strongest over and windward of the Oquirrhs and Wasatch Range, including the northern and central Wasatch and weakest over the western Salt Lae Valley.  

Finally, by 0848 MST (1548 UTC), the influence of the Oquirrhs and central Wasatch remain apparent, but there is also an elongated band of higher reflectivity extending from the Great Salt Lake to the central Wasatch.  

We have done computer model simulations of similar storm periods in the past in which we were unable to reproduce such a precipitation pattern unless we included both the lake and the topography.  Below is an example from one northwesterly flow storm in which we ran with the best representation of the lake and terrain possible (CTL), removed the lake and the topography (FLAT-NL), removed only the topography (FLAT), included the lake and the Wasatch (WAS), included the lake and the downstream terrain but no upstream terrain (DT), and removed the lake (NL).  There's a lot to digest there, but if there's no topography, the event only produces some light downstream snowshowers.  If there is no lake, only light precipitation occurs over the higher terrain including the Oquirrhs and central Wasatch.  However, when you run with them both (CTL), you get a solid storm.  Thus, both lake- and terrain-driven processes contribute. 

Source: Alcott and Steenburgh (2013)

I suspect this may have been the case for this later stage of the storm yesterday, although that's just a hypothesis at this point.  Overall though, I see yesterdays storm as one that was strongly driven by flow interaction with topography, with perhaps some lake influences thrown in later in the event.  

A few more thoughts

Yesterday's storm was impressive for snowfall rate as measured by depth, but less of an outlier from a water-equivalent perspective.  The 20" of snow that fell had a water content around 5%.  During the period when 5" fell, only 0.15" of water equivalent was observed.  That would be around 3% (although that estimate may be a little low due to gauge undercatch of snowfall).  Peak 1-h water equivalent rates were around 0.17".  That's not bad, but it's also not exceptional.  If you are wondering, the highest 1-h water equivalent was 0.17".  That's not bad, but it's also not exceptional.  The record hourly water equivalent snowfall rate at Alta-Collins is 0.54", which occurred from 0300 to 0400 MST 5 Jan 2008 in southwesterly flow accompanying a "warm and juicy" atmospheric river event just ahead of an approaching trough.  

I share these observations to highlight to different ways that one might measure and evaluate extreme snow rates.  One is based on snowfall amount.  The other is based on water equivalent amount.  Yesterday's snowfall extreme occurred due to the high snow-to-liquid ratios (i.e., low water content).  From a water perspective, it all that impressive.  Storms that produce high water equivalent rates are often warmer, with lower snow-to-liquid ratios, yielding lower snowfall amount rates.  For these storms, my eyebrows pick up when we start approaching 0.3" per hour.  

Thus, much depends on the metric that you use, although none of these scientific semantics take away from what I hear was an outstanding day of skiing.